View Single Post
Old 02-25-10, 08:11 AM
  #8  
joejack951
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,098

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1240 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by AdamDZ
Yup. Belts may be stronger than chains. Think of the timing belts used in car and truck engines. That's some real heat and torque there compared to a bike and they survive tens of thousands of miles.

Adam
Heat, yes. Torque, not so much. The belt is only spinning the cam(s) and maybe the waterpump. I can do those tasks by hand (though not quite as fast). Timing chains often last the life of a car while belts are typically replaced before 100,000 miles, if not much sooner. Timing belts are used for lighter weight and lower noise, not for longevity

That's not to say that a belt drive couldn't hold up on a bike. CVT transmissions use belts and so do motorcycles so a bicycle should do just fine with one assuming it was designed correctly.
joejack951 is offline