Old 04-07-10, 12:31 AM
  #3  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Tend to agree, especially since it seems like a pretty involved operation to convert the bike between the two modes. I'd think it would be more cost effective to get a bike for your primary function and then buy an inexpensive used bike that'll perform the secondary function. That way you have both available and can pick the best tool for a given ride. It also gives you redundancy if something breaks and temporarily puts one of the bikes out of commission.
prathmann is offline