Originally Posted by
TechKnowGN
I get you hate Armstrong, but the point that Landis has more credibility is pure falsehood. Has lance looked guilty? plenty of times. Is he guilty? No one knows right now. But what we do know is that Landis has lied over and over again, and there are enough holes inthe current story that its entirely possible he's lying again.
You want so badly to believe Lance is guilty, that you'll take the word of a known liar whose story doesnt totally add up based on the straight up indisputable facts (specifically around the Tour de Suisse).
I get the you idolize Armstrong, but saying that Armstrong has any shred of credibility after he has shown multiple times to lie, backstab, and ruin people's careers is just on the level of mancrush idolatry. The difference between Landis and Armstrong is that one is a past liar, the other is a current continual liar. There are already reports of other pro cyclists that have confirmed what Landis has said about Armstrong's doping.