View Single Post
Old 11-06-10, 08:51 PM
  #19  
USAZorro
Señor Member
 
USAZorro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923

Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times in 638 Posts
Originally Posted by auchencrow
I am not sure why they call it the Rivendell fit... Isn't it just the traditional fit?

Based on what is most commonly available for sale here today, I'd have to say that the median size for a 70's-era English or French bike was 23-24", while the height of the average European male was 5'8" .

So why do I often hear people today (most of whom are slightly taller than 5'8") refer to the 24" bikes as "huge", or the 25" frames as "freakishly large"?
I'm 5' 9" and of rather "normal" proportions. I have a 23.5" bike, and that's at the limit of what I'd consider riding. To me, anything larger I might call "huge".
__________________
In search of what to search for.
USAZorro is offline