Old 05-25-05, 09:13 PM
  #4  
thechamp
loser
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: portland, or
Posts: 385

Bikes: steyr, lejeune, schwinn, sears, crescent, blah blah blah.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeff williams
The small ring has no pins any way, it might be ramped..so it might work anyway.
I take triples apart, the first ring is not ramped @ least what I've seen.
The mid ring is ramped\pinned, the outer is ramped.
I THINK the important effect will be ramps on the big, not the small.
yeah, I figured the small ring wouldn't be that special, my only real concern was the alignment of the teeth on the small ring to the pins on the big having an acceptable or unaccetable effect.

Originally Posted by sydney
I have several setups with non ramped and pinned ring and it works perfectly with STI. The A and B buainess in mostly shimano marketing and makes little or no differenct in actual use.I would not even mess with changing out the inner ring. You sure the Sugino cranks are 130? I've also seem em in 144, 135 and 110 BCD.
The cranks maybe SR? I eyeballed them against an old shimano 600 drive side crank and they looked to be the same. it's entirely possible that I'm wrong, of course.

thanks for the advice, you two.

Last edited by thechamp; 05-25-05 at 09:15 PM. Reason: grammar
thechamp is offline