View Single Post
Old 01-20-11, 08:16 PM
  #4  
3alarmer 
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26411 Post(s)
Liked 10,377 Times in 7,205 Posts
Do I Have A Point?

Originally Posted by Camilo
If the TT were 54.5, I wouldn't be concerned. But what I'm hearing is that the 21.5" frame (i.e. the 54.5cm frame) has a 56cm TT.

I'm not worried at all about what parts it takes or originality. I've been looking at some built bikes but would change what I need to. I've also been looking at some frame/forks and would build them up with modern parts I have on hand. Either way, that doesn't matter.
I currently own (or at least live with) four
of these: a '70-71 Professional, a '73 (?)
Competition, a '70-71 Super Course, and
a much loved and slightly abused Sports
of God only knows vintage.

I ride mostly 23"-24" frames, but the Pro
has 700c wheels, so even at 24.5" I can
just make the standover.

I have no idea how to answer your question.
So much of this is personal preference and
willingness to tweak until the thing gets
dialed in. You may discover you actually
prefer the longer TT, as did I recently.

My own feeling is that there are so many
variables in terms of frame geometry and
your own weight and weight distribution,
that any answer I might give based on what
you have posted would essentially be
meaningless. (Some of my friends might
tell you that any answer from me would be
meaningless .)

BTW, do not discount the Super Course out
of hand simply because it's straight gauge tubing.
If you can manage the transition from cottered
to cotterless crank, it makes a very nice ride.

Respectfully,
Mike Larmer
__________________
3alarmer is offline