Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
You have two different topics to consider.
Your LBS might be discussing compliance, that is: the ability of the bike to flex and provide some shock absorption. Some Cyclocross bikes are very stiff for good power transfer, while others are more forgiving for ride comfort.
The second issue is fit. Faster road racers like a more aerodynamic fit, with a large height difference between the saddle and the handlebars. Some Cyclocross competitors might want a large drop from the saddle to the handlebars, others may not, since speeds are often less while Cyclocross racing, compared to road racing.
Most lower-cost Cyclocross bikes, especially those with eyelets for fenders and racks, are designed to be more comfortable than bikes designed for racing. In other words: Some Cyclocross bikes are stiff for power transfer and fitted with aerodynamics in mind, while others are designed for recreational use primarily.