View Single Post
Old 06-13-05, 04:42 PM
  #6  
webist
Huachuca Rider
 
webist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,275

Bikes: Fuji CCR1, Specialized Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by my58vw
Cyclists are people who ride a bike for more than transportation.

Someone who jumps on a bike to go to the store is not a cyclist

The kid who rides against traffic with no lights is not a cyclist

The boy who rides his bike to school is not a cyclist.

It is the people who ride a bike for the ride and not for a need is a cyclist. Cyclists enjoy the ride, savor every moment on the bike, take the long way home, ride ti unique and nice locations instead of driving. Cyclists ride for sport, for recreation, for fun, for enjoyment. Anyone can be a cyclist, the little kid, the parent, the racer, the guy riding his bike to work.

Now wikopedia says something different



Transportation bothers me. Many people ride a bike because they have no other option (kids going to school, to the store, etc). I think cyclists are those who transport on a bike for choice, free will...

But everyone will have thier own opinion!
I think you are answering my point. Though I think I list messengers, bike cops and commuters among cyclists as well. My point though was to ask whether anyone with a bike bewteen their legs at a given moment was actually a "cyclist." Conversely, though not made a point of my original post, a cyclist would still be a cyclist even if not actually on a bike. No?
__________________
Just Peddlin' Around
webist is offline