john, your new fangled, fringe interpretation has no legal backing, lacks common sense, is unreasonable, and fails to provide any compelling argument. Stop bluffing, stop fighting to restrict cyclists with your flawed ideas about SMV-FRAP laws.
Any notion that two lane roads have both right hand lanes and left hand lanes for same direction traffic is absolutely nonsensical.
"THERE'S A BUS COMING RIGHT AT US IN THE LEFT LANE, LOU!" comes to mind in a skit involving Abbott and Costello.
Originally Posted by erstwhile cycling author
It is reasonable to conclude that "the right-hand lane for traffic" means that two or more lanes are available for traffic in that direction (if this is not the assumption, the phrase would have no relevance).
suggestions to the contrary are wholly unreasonable and irrelevant.