Old 06-16-11, 03:44 PM
  #5  
cccorlew
Erect member since 1953
 
cccorlew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 7,000

Bikes: Trek 520 Grando, Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Ti Century Elite turned commuter, Some old French thing gone fixie

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 21 Posts
This all makes me so angry I don't know where to start. Oh, wait. Yes I do. With the driver WHO LEFT THE SCENE AND HID. How is that not a major felony? How is that not a crime against humanity? How is he not assumed to be an impaired driver, just because he had time to sober up?

And what about the DA? I'm angry with those folks, whoever didn't puesue this with any aggression at all. What's wrong with them? How are they serving me, a road user, and tax payer?

And this: "He pleaded guilty to what he did. If he didn't leave,
there wouldn't be a crime here," Cardoza said. "The
victim was in dark clothing, going like a bullet down
a hill. It wasn't all my client's fault."

So, your client crossed over to hit him? That's legal? And I'd like the "dark clothing, going like a bullet down a hill." confirmed, though why does that even matter?Arrrgggggg. This man should never drive again, and he, the judge, the DA, and his lawyer, and all their families should be made to ride bicycles everywhere for the next 5 years.
cccorlew is offline