View Single Post
Old 06-22-11, 07:06 PM
  #12  
eja_ bottecchia
Senior Member
 
eja_ bottecchia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,791
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1020 Post(s)
Liked 463 Times in 293 Posts
Originally Posted by Chaco
I've been very happy with the 500. It appears to be MUCH more reliable than many other devices, including other Garmins, on calorie counts. Mine generally comes in at around 25 calories per mile for a 30 mile ride with 2500 feet of climbing and an average HR of 145 [my max is 170]. Other devices typically report up to twice that amount, giving you a very unrealistic view of how much exercise you've done.

I've never had a problem with mileage, or for that matter, any other measurement, except for elevation. My Garmin tends to report it about 100 feet too low, but that's a relatively small problem for me.

I particularly like the ability to download the data and review it after the ride. It really helps you see if you're improving on common sections of terrain.

I also like the ability to have 3 different customizable display screens.
Chaco, your experience and comments track with my own experience with the Garmin Edge 500. I love the ability to download my ride data to my computer and then to be able to track my progress.

I have not had any problems with my 500; it was simple to install and it has been accurate and trouble-free. I give it two thumbs (and a couple of big toes) up!

BTW, Chaco, nice Corgi on your profile pic. Gotta love small dogs with big dog attitude!

Last edited by eja_ bottecchia; 06-22-11 at 09:57 PM. Reason: Misspelled dog's name....argggg!!!!
eja_ bottecchia is offline