Old 08-22-11, 08:35 AM
  #22  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,716

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5787 Post(s)
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,430 Posts
Originally Posted by aggiegrads

I have everything put back together, so my only question that remains is whether or not there was plastic deformation in the crank arm. If so, I would think that I need to slightly over-torque to get the arms on far enough to avoid loosening at the taper. ....

Any input?
It depends on the surface inside the cranks and if the area at the corners is OK. Ideally the crank will meet the spindle tightest near the corners, and not be restricted by any high spots in the centers of the flats. If you're good with a file and have small curved files, you can file a hair (and only about that much) off the centers of the flats so the spindle is holds in the corners.

Otherwise the torque is the same or close, since you're not actually making the crank tighter, simply pushing it higher on the taper.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline