View Single Post
Old 10-12-11, 11:44 PM
  #4  
SlimRider
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 5,804

Bikes: Raleigh Grand Prix, Giant Innova, Nishiki Sebring, Trek 7.5FX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by easyv
Hi, I currently have a trek 7100 for 2 years, and thought it's time for upgrade.

Twice I tried to test a Giant Via 2 on the advice of a coworker who is an experienced rider. But both times they either didn't have my size or not in stock. One shop said i'd be better off with a Cannondale Quick 5. My purposes are basically commuter, getting about in the city. I still want decent performance obviously. I would compromise a bit of comfort for performance.

I did try the Cannondale quick 5, since i was there. I liked that it was lighter. But still wondering if i should wait and try the Via 2. They are both roughly the same price.

-$549 for the cannondale, shop said they'd put a bike rack and bottle holder included in that price
http://www.cannondale.com/2012-quick-5-21008

-$520 for the Via
http://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-us/....2/9017/48862/

Does anyone else have any opinions about these bikes relative to one another?
I couldn't find anything online comparing these two so thought i'd ask.

thanks a lot
V
I think that whenever a cyclist compares two different bicycles of similar price, when preparing to make a purchase, the first thing that they should consider, should be the bicycle frame material.

Aluminum has a lower fatigue life than steel. If kept dry, the chromoly steel frame of the Via2 can last for decades. One cannot say that about aluminum, given the daily rigorous use of both. Of course, the proper fit and the feel of the ride, trumps anything one can advise. One way or another!

- Slim

Consider the Via2 as more of an intelligent investment for the future...

Last edited by SlimRider; 10-12-11 at 11:48 PM.
SlimRider is offline