View Single Post
Old 10-28-11, 03:21 PM
  #15  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times in 1,213 Posts
Okay, from this thread I've got two reasons Camelback may be better than Polar:

(1) Some people bought defective Polar bottles, and some other people bought non-defective Camelback.

(2) Camelback has an optional flip top.

Now, since the Polar bottles I've bought haven't leaked, (1) doesn't apply to me. And riding mostly roads, I don't mind wiping off a bit of dust, so (2) doesn't apply.

After using my Polars daily for 80 days, plus 2-3 uses per week for 3-5 years, I don't know of anything else that would last through that much use. Are Camelback bottles better? just more fashionable? or am I really missing something here?
pdlamb is offline