Originally Posted by
Six-Shooter
2) citing nonprofessional or unreliable sources, such as Wikipedia or a blog; citing anonymous essays from openly partisan, polemical sites like bhsi.org or cyclehelmets.org; or citing letters to the editor in a journal instead of a peer-reviewed study.
I disagree with this. Wikipedia is more and more becoming an accepted source, providing the claims in it you are using to support your position are cited.
Last edited by sudo bike; 01-30-12 at 11:26 AM.