View Single Post
Old 07-20-05, 06:08 AM
  #30  
CdCf
Videre non videri
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 3,208

Bikes: 1 road bike (simple, light), 1 TT bike (could be more aero, could be lighter), 1 all-weather commuter and winter bike, 1 Monark 828E ergometer indoor bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I'll give you an example.

Take a rider+bike weighing 100 kg.
Let's say this fictional rider is capable of putting out a maximum of 200 W.
His total CdA is 0.4. His bike's Cfr is 0.006.

Let's say he rides 100 km over three different courses.

Course #1 is a completely flat road. No climbs or descents at all.
His average speed is 31 km/h.
The total energy spent is 2640 kcal (or around 820 kcal/hour).

Course #2 is a course with 25 km flat road, 25 km with a 5% climb, 25 km with a 5% descent (one hell of a ride!) and finally 25 km of flat road.
Here, the average speed drops to 24.7 km/h, but the energy spent goes up to 3320 kcal!

Course #3 is a 10% climb for 50 km, followed by a 10% descent for the remaining 50 km (wohooo!!!).
Average speed is now down to a snail-like 12.7 km/h, but the energy required is a massive 6490 kcal!!!

He begins and ends at the same elevation in all three rides, yet the differences in energy and averages are staggering!
Convinced?
CdCf is offline