Originally Posted by
Six-Shooter
I'm fully aware of that...
if you are aware of that, with the posts you've been putting up, you certainly are dismissive of the contrary research, to the point of accepting inferior research over superior research.
As to why you are pursuing such a myopic view I can only guess that you do so because it jives with your position that cycling is dangerous, and the helmet is the cure for that danger.
I'm also curious as to how you think a helmet can provide protection below it's test line, in impacts greater than 12mph, and from the forces that cause a brain to rotate within the skull, independent of of the movement (if any) of the skull.