View Single Post
Old 04-19-12, 09:10 AM
  #49  
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Posts: 24,221
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 711 Post(s)
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by zephyr
Here in the southern california megalopolis, some of my co-workers participate in van pools for long haul commutes (40 to 60 miles each way). Each vanpool member pays roughly $60-$80 per month depending on the number of people in the vanpool. My employer pays the gasoline and toll road costs for the vanpool. I am guessing this costs my employer at least $200 per week per vanpool. Somehow they get some of this back in the form of tax rebates for encouraging van pools. In reality those state or fed tax rebates and subsidies by my employer are encouraging and facilitating a lot of people to live in very distant communities. Are subsidized vanpools part of the problem or part of the solution? I don't think my tax money should subsidize someone else's super long haul van commute. I don't take subsidies for my daily bike commute, even though there is some red-tape wrapped bike commute expense reimbursement that was passed a few years ago.
I don't like subsidizing somebody's absurdly long commute either. But what I really hate is the direct subsidies that governments pay to corporations for parking structures at their facilities. As a taxpayer I help pay for parking towers that I will never use.

This is supposedly to "bring jobs to the region." Thses companies successfully blackmail and extort cash strapped local and state governments to pay for their employee parking. In my city we just gave a big tax break to an insurance company--and also deviated from our city plan to let them build a parking garage on beautiful riverrfront land.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline