Old 07-10-12, 10:37 AM
  #11  
SteamingAlong
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: North Attleboro, MA
Posts: 229

Bikes: 2011 Steamroller; 1998 Cannondale F-400; 1981 Motobecane Jubilee Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by fly:yes/land:no
how about you read a news article before walking in here and telling people what is up.

first google result for "lance dismissed":

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/sp...g-charges.html



or if you don't take their word for it, read the ****ing order:

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/package...rong_order.pdf

first paragraph bolded - "WITHOUT PREJUDICE"

final paragraph - IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Armstrong shall file any amended complaint within TWENTY (20) DAYS of entry of this order, or this case shall be closed and dismissed for failure to prosecute, and for failure to comply with this Court's orders."
Without prejudice doesn't mean he didn't waste the courts time with this case filing a case with no merit.

Maybe he should get Canseco and Bonds to join in with him. Since they have as much of a complaint as Lance.

Last edited by CbadRider; 07-10-12 at 01:35 PM. Reason: Edited quoted post
SteamingAlong is offline