Old 07-10-12, 11:13 AM
  #12  
fly:yes/land:no
abandoning
 
fly:yes/land:no's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,068
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by SteamingAlong
Without prejudice doesn't mean he didn't waste the courts time with this case filing a case with no merit.

Maybe he should get Canseco and Bonds to join in with him. Since they have as much of a complaint as Lance.
failing again.

1. canseco was never charged by usada
2. bonds was never charged by usada
3. i can actually point out these facts as well as linking the order above without being a lance shill. in fact if you took the time to read my posts in the 217, i think you could easily discern on which side of the line i fall.
4. ironic - you attempting to debate the meaning of "without prejudice" while consistently making erroneous arguments and misstating facts simply to bolster your claim that lance doped/is a "TOOL".

Last edited by CbadRider; 07-10-12 at 01:35 PM. Reason: Edited quoted post
fly:yes/land:no is offline