Originally Posted by
Jed19
You are wrong. As pointed out in post #3, USA cycling is the absolute licensing body and regulator for the sport in the USA, and it has a contract with USADA for its anti-doping measures. If LA or anybody else took out a cycling license in the USA, then they are bound by the rules and regulations of USA cycling, and of course, by extension USADA. The SCOTUS won't touch this with a ten-foot pole. A strictly private affair.
Its not strictly private. The USADA gets government funding.
Its the same thing with the Boy Scouts. You get government funding, or lease property from the government, then you have to abide by rules that wouldnt apply to strictly private groups.
We'll see how it plays out.