Old 09-17-12, 08:39 AM
  #5  
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times in 1,383 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
Heart rate zone does not always give the same calorie expenditure, it depends on activity.
Running 2 hours at a 6 min mile pace requires about 2200 Calories for a 155 lb person.
The 100k in 4.5h, is that in km, amounts to about 14 mph. That will require about 850 Calories in the same 2 hours.

Also, you mentioned using a tandem, these are much more efficient than the rugular bike figures above. There is twice the power with almost half the drag, meaning even less calories required on the tandem.
Wrong.
Carbonfiberboy is offline