Originally Posted by
Daves_Not_Here
Any idea what that amendment would have been? I read the veto letter, and it seems that Brown is strongly hinting that Caltrans has a path to success, if someone will take it.
I'm trying not to be pedantic -- it seems other states have skinned this cat by permitting drivers to cross the double yellow in order to give 3 ft of clearance. What have they done to mitigate the risk of head-on collision lawsuits?
I'm not sure what was involved in the amendment, and the media has not received any word either according to this article.
http://roadwarrior.blogs.pressdemocr...ng-bicyclists/
"Brown didn’t elaborate on Caltrans’ plan, and Caltrans officials were unavailable for comment Friday evening".