Originally Posted by
rekmeyata
Any evidence that it doesn't? Funny, a more stringent testing to pass more severe impacts means nothing to you.
A stringent testing procedure doesn't mean a darn thing if the test procedure is not derived or based on real world use.
If the stringent test procedures result in a "safer" helmet for the users, and it is promoted as safer, than it is the responsibility of the testers and promoters to prove why it is safer.