Old 05-17-13, 09:29 PM
  #47  
Bekologist
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Right.

and on this section of a build up of the interurban trail network, the problematic intersections can, and should, be redesigned to more safely address these concerns. Jan really mischaracterizes this road as having a lot of intersection conflicts. some of this backs up on a Kmart and mall, for instance. NO intersection conflicts whatsoever. and a lot of the streets to the east of the cycletrack have very limited ( a block to three) street lengths.

People need to understand the cycle track Jan is being critical of is a build up of the interurban trail - a major, mosty off road path network N/S into seattle that is a MAJOR commuting route into downtown, with greater cycle transportation potential.

from Wiki - "The Interurban Trail North begins as a signed bicycle route in downtown Seattle running through the Fremont neighborhood, through Phinney Ridge and Greenwood, to 110th and Fremont where it becomes a paved rail trail until 128th and Linden where it will become a cycletrack to the City of Shoreline Border.[1][2] At the City of Shoreline the route becomes a wide non-motorized route for 3 miles until the Snohomish County line."

it will be easy for the city to mitigate the issues Jan has identified along the track, assess and modify any genuinely problematic crossings.

Last edited by Bekologist; 05-17-13 at 09:36 PM.
Bekologist is offline