I have a real problem with papers publishing editorials or rants that include statements that suggest behaviors that are illegal or go against what is legally allowed (such as riding in street) or that include plain wrong 'facts' Publishing opinions is one thing, but lies or misinformation another. Not just in regard to these specific rants, but opinion pages in general. (and I am not talking about 'debatable' facts, but ones that are clearly wrong if any fact checking was done by an unbiases source)
I understand it is a rant page intended to stir up controversy, but the editors should provide comment on what is legally allowed (i.e. at minimum ed. note: cyclist are legally permitted on road) if a rant is perpetuating an expectation of cyclist that can be dangerous and in some states not legal by riding on sidewalk.
Al