View Single Post
Old 08-11-13, 05:30 AM
  #13  
achoo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Wesley36
Hmmm, interesting made-up numbers. There is a lot of math floating around the interwebs that show quite clearly that the often made claim that slower riders will get no benefit from aero enhancement is false - the slower rider gets a GREATER time saving than the faster rider. The faster rider will be more likely to win races with aero enhancements though...

...
But then you post this:

Originally Posted by Wesley36
PS Re: my first claim. 10 seconds on google turned this up:

http://alex-cycle.blogspot.ca/2013/0...er-riders.html

The faster rider takes 3.3% off his time, the slower one 3.1%.

When you're finishing 5 minutes off the pace, the fact that your uber-aero wheels and frame saved you more absolute time than they saved the winner is totally irrelevant.

It's like spending thousands of dollars and putting performance parts on a Yugo. BFD. If you really want to get faster spend your money on a coach who knows what he's doing instead.
achoo is offline