View Single Post
Old 08-25-13, 07:54 PM
  #39  
bitingduck
Senior Member
 
bitingduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,170
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
It's not at all true that anything other than a line sensor is a waste, just that you're throwing away useful data if you downsample a slow array detector to use it as a line sensor. A 240 fps camera would be awesome at just about anything local/states/regional if you can identify numbers and step through the individual frames without having to do any processing (i.e. just capture to the computer and start stepping). When a few cameras started coming out with those kinds of speeds ~4 years ago it looked like they didn't use frame based file formats, which makes them hard to use as a finish camera. Even a 30-60 fps camera works for most purposes if you can get a 1/1000s shutter speed. I have a $150 MiniDV camera that works great for local races.

But here's a page full of linescan cameras (need lenses still) that would mostly work and be less than a finishlynx. Least expensive is about $1500 and has 2048 px (plenty to put across a road) and ~50 klines/sec: https://www.machinevisionstore.com/C...gory=1&group=2

Not quite cheap enough for hobbyist territory, but close if you're going to start a finish line business.
__________________
Track - the other off-road
http://www.lavelodrome.org
bitingduck is offline