Hmm, okay another update edit, and in pretty red now as well.
Apparently there is a forum rule I'm unaware of that requires that if I make post-51 concerning a topic raised in post-50. I must quote the relative part of post-50 or at least say that is the post I'm referring too and if I do not my post will be considered off topic and misunderstood. And such will ruled to be completely a result of me failing to quote or at least reference post-50 as what I'm answering when I write post-51.
Thanking you for pointing out another area where I must indeed be careful to not count on "common sense" or trust the "obvious". I admit that I have been trapped by my own logic on that one.