View Single Post
Old 11-18-13, 09:37 AM
  #105  
GeorgeBMac
Senior Member
 
GeorgeBMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,061

Bikes: 2012 Trek DS 8.5 all weather hybrid, 2008 LeMond Poprad cyclocross, 1992 Cannondale R500 roadbike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And, from today's (Nov 18th) New York Times:
"Risk Calculator for Cholesterol Appears Flawed"



http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/18/he...flawed.html?hp

... And, what they point out is exactly my experience with it: It calculated my risk at about 50% greater than any other risk calculator I had ever used...

But what the article does NOT address are the questions:
-- Why would you prescribe a cholesterol lowering medication for somebody with high blood pressure?
-- Why would you prescribe a cholesterol lowering medication for somebody who's only problem is old age?

Even if the calculator was excellent at predicting risk, that doesn't mean that every risk factor can be cured with a statin!

From the article:
"Some doctors who tested the calculator with hypothetical patients wondered if they should trust the results.Dr. Nissen entered the figures for a 60-year-old African-American man with no risk factors — total cholesterol of 150, HDL (the good cholesterol) of 45, systolic blood pressure of 125 — who was not a diabetic or a smoker. He ended up with a 10-year risk of 7.5 percent, meaning he should be taking cholesterol-lowering statins despite being in a seemingly low-risk group.
Dr. Nissen also calculated the figures for a healthy white man, age 60, and also got a risk factor of 7.5 percent.
“Something is terribly wrong,” Dr. Nissen said. Using the calculator’s results, he said, “your average healthy Joe gets treated, virtually every African-American man over 65 gets treated.”

Last edited by GeorgeBMac; 11-18-13 at 09:41 AM. Reason: Add Dr Nissen quote
GeorgeBMac is offline