Originally Posted by
genec
No doubt a failure as probably everyone drove... but question... the above is in fact true, or do you know of something otherwise?
It is something of an irony that the court, upon hearing that testimony, would likely ignore it.
Really? Where can I find in the Constitution (not
somebody's specious interpretation of it), "Constitutional grounds that to travel by human powered bicycle vehicle on the public transportation right of ways (legal talk for roads) is not a privilege but rather a
Constitutional Right within the "freedom to travel cause."
Whether everyone drove to traffic court or not is a red herring; bringing it up in traffic court (as well as this thread), would be another sure nail in a defendant's case. The best that could be hoped is that the traffic court would ignore it as well as a spacey defense based on an equally spacey interpretation of the Constitution to beat a traffic ticket.