Old 12-04-13, 09:48 PM
  #8  
benjdm
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 464

Bikes: Sun EZ-Speedster SX, Volae Expedition

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by howsteepisit
Interesting decision and agreement, a federal magistrate has upheld that a cyclist in MA must move to the right to allow cars to pass when its objectively safe to do so. So its a bit of a blow against vehicular cycling, and creates a huge gray area of the meaning of objectively safe. I am sure there is lots to discuss here.
It's also ambiguous about what moving to the right requires. Do you have to move over to the shoulder or merely move right within the lane?

I've been searching to try and find the actual settlement text or details but I haven't succeeded.
benjdm is offline