View Single Post
Old 12-20-13, 07:32 AM
  #11  
Italia1970
Senior Member
 
Italia1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 114

Bikes: Trek FX 7.7 2013

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by giantcfr1
It must be right. Why else would Trek model their bikes with numbers in decimals?

Seriously though, I personally think many of these what Trek should I buy threads are started by Trek shills. It seems almost every day 'a 60 year old with neck, back, wrist etc. trouble' starts a thread, nine times out of ten, focusing on Treks. Most (as with this OP) don't contribute to the post after the initial question, and are never heard from again.
Bikes direct did the same thing a few years back and it falsely created huge interest in the company on these forums.
Think about it kids, it's not that hard to choose a bike.
Point is on an apples to apples basis of course the higher model should be better.
That isn't the issue, it what bike meets his needs better, which makes that comment you made about useless.
Italia1970 is offline