View Single Post
Old 12-24-13, 10:16 AM
  #173  
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by buzzman
Really? In all honesty you and BCarfree have totally turned me off on the Portland model.

The idea of sitting around a city waiting for the next economic downturn hoping for an uptick in cyclists while riding on what sounds like a mess of poor infrastructure, presided over by Copenhaginistas forcing inadequate segregated bike paths down an unwilling populace's throats surrounded by cadres of simmering suburban motorists is not appealing.

And riding on jammed infrastructure, which Bcarfree claims "intimidates, maims and kills", amidst a herd of smugly dissatisfied bicyclists feels like an Orwellian nightmare. I'll take the Utopic, pie in the sky, enthusiasm of a city like NY, Minneapolis or Boston any day.

What in the world makes it such an awesome city to ride in?
*20-25 mph speed limits.
*Mostly tamed bulls.
*Road dieted arterials.
*Businesses designed for (and by) cyclists.
*Bike parking.
spare_wheel is offline