Old 12-30-13, 07:59 PM
  #8  
justaguest
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by deerfly
My wife has a Quick 4, I have the quick sl2. My SL2 is easily a couple pounds lighter than the 4 even though my bike is a large while my wife's is a small. I too like the Quick Carbon's but the "cheap"one is a grand more than my SL2, a little too expensive for my blood.

Before buying my Cannondale, I had tried an FX7.5 and a Sirrus Comp. The FX just didn’t feel right to me. There was nothing particularly bad about it but it just didn’t have that “wow” factor. The Sirrus, though it had the better components than the other two, was a little too stretched out for me and my old/badneck.
What was the issue with neck? Do you mean that Quick is more upright when compared to Sirrus Comp? What felt lighter Quick or Comp?
Thanks a lot!
justaguest is offline