Old 02-27-14, 02:55 PM
  #22  
qqy
▒▒▒▒▒▒
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 476
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by link0
I would hands down go with the carbon...and generally more durable in crashes.
Uhh.. no.

OP: it's really about the ride you want. The Tarmac will be smoother feeling and perhaps have a better strength-to-weight ratio. The Allez will be stiff and durable. The geometry is the same. 'Smartweld' is really just marketing gimmickry, but now the Allez does have nicer-looking smooth welds (a la Cannondale, which some say weakens the frame). Allezs has been raced to victories under Cipollini (2004) and Tarmacs under Boonen (to name a few). Both are proven bikes and you really can't make a bad choice. Ride both and see which calls out to you.

My first race bike was an Allez, and I am building up a 2013 Allez thanks to a sweet deal from my sponsor for as my current race bike. I don't find them to be the most comfortable, but I love the snappy feel and aggressive geometry. Reminds me of my track bike. It is a bit buzzy on rough terrain tho.

To throw a wrench in it - I would also consider a CAAD10 if you're really lusting after the Allez. Also a superb bike. But if the price is the same for either build, and you're not racing, I would go with the Tarmac.
qqy is offline