Old 03-11-14, 05:46 PM
  #623  
carleton
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by WeekKnees
This question about Keirin races has been on my mind. If NJS specification is design to reduce/remove equipment advantage, how has it changed over time? Surely if I ride a modern NJS approved bike, I have an unfair advantage compared to a racer from 10-20 yrs ago, right?
I don't think you'd have any advantage in terms of creating speed or better aerodynamics. The only advantage I can see is maybe in the areas of safety (pads, helmets), durability (tires), nutrition (new studies, new supplements), or training (benefiting from new "best practices" and whatnot).

Originally Posted by queerpunk
NJS standards haven't changed meaningfully in that amount of time.
I dunno, maybe there is some tubing that's a little bit lighter or stiffer, but the basics are the same.
+1


EDIT:

Also, maybe Baby Puke will answer. He raced NJS races in Japan. Here's his blog: http://keirin-jotourist.blogspot.com/

Last edited by carleton; 03-11-14 at 05:51 PM.
carleton is offline