View Single Post
Old 04-04-14, 11:21 AM
  #5  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,696

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5774 Post(s)
Liked 2,571 Times in 1,423 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider

Incidentally, Shimano never produced compact-specific front derailleurs saying they were unnecessary. After a couple of years, Campy agreed and dropped them from their product line.
Necessary is a matter of opinion which can change very quickly depending on the market and cost of producing more permutations of a product. Every tooth changes the radius of a chainring by about 1/12" so a 50t ring would come up about 1/4" lower than a 53t. Depending on the height of the braze on and length of it's slot, this can make for FD locating issues when changing rings.

There's also the issue of the curvature of the cage, Going to smaller rings is rarely a problem, but going to rings larger than those the FD is designed for can cause the heel to touch the ring while the front is well above the 2mm clearance target.

So while 50 or 53t may no be a problem, bigger changes, or using mtb FD with 53t rings can be.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline