View Single Post
Old 04-07-14, 06:18 PM
  #34  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,862 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by rekon
Thanks, does this mean a smaller bike frame is less reliable?
Originally Posted by jsigone
Smaller sizes like 49 and lower starts messing with angles and stuff to make 700c wheels fit.
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant.

Looking at your bike you'd really need to go down to a 48 to get a typical amount of seat post exposed (the 51 only gets you another inch), and in the process you'd get lower handlebars, a steeper seat tube angle and a slacker head tube angle -- none of which are likely to be positive.

That's not to say the 48 wouldn't fit you better by some arbitrary standard, but there are positives and negatives. Since you already have the bike, you're better off keeping it unless there's something that feels like a problem to you. Things that just look like problems in a picture are much less important.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline