View Single Post
Old 06-07-14, 01:21 AM
  #10  
Rowan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,771
Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1454 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times in 40 Posts
Originally Posted by JimF22003
I'm pretty sure I could do a zero-calorie-of-any-kind metric. I've done 40 or 50 miles with no food many times.

Not sure what it would prove though.
I've done a full imperial century on just water. It proved I could do it, and it gave me an idea of what I could expect to do if I ran out of food on a randonnee, for example. But apart from that, it's not something I would repeat unless I had to.

The takeout from Al's experience probably is the need to match the ability to digest what's been eaten, especially when it's something that takes much longer to process than say, carbs, with the output at the pedals.

While 12mph might be training speed for some, effort to achieve that might be significant depending on terrain. There seem to be a few climbs and undulating terrain in the ride, which translates to some intensity... which means the protein is going to sit in the stomach stewing rather than being converted to energy.

FWIW, I think protein is an important part of food intake on rides, but in much smaller proportions compared with carbs. But if someone is on a low-carb diet, I think they just have to accept what others have said -- their intensity is going to be lower than others when it comes to longer distance rides.
Rowan is offline