View Single Post
Old 06-29-14, 10:33 AM
  #23  
chaadster
Thread Killer
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,440

Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada

Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3143 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times in 1,031 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton
It's not a problem there, because the position errors will tend to average out over the longer term. It's only the instantaneous speed readings that will really have a problem.

Trees and even atmospheric conditions will throw a given reading off. Even then, even with everything perfect, without augmentation the civilian gps-only device is accurate to at best 3 meters, worst case 8 meters. Which means we simply can't expect a phone GPS to provide an accurate instantaneous speed reading but it can be can closer if the software is sophisticated enough.
I understand what you're saying, but I do not understand how that explains why Strava is responsible for the wild reading inaccuracies we're hearing reported here.
chaadster is offline