Old 06-29-14, 11:17 PM
  #3  
The B
(retired from forum)
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Leisesturm
I'm not following your math or your reasoning. FWIW I am 5'10 and my inseam is around 33". I have 165mm pedals on one of my bikes. Most of them have 170 but a couple have 175. None have 172.5. If you get from that that I don't think that there is a magic crank length for a given inseam you would be right. Nor do I think the average person could tell the difference between a 170 and a 175 crank. But lets say it is true. How does the 2.5mm difference in crank length result in a 25mm reduction in seat height?

H
Not reduction- increase.

But you're right- my numbers are ********ly off. Obviously mixed up my CMs and my MMs in a spot or two.

But what I'd get is a 2.5mm INCREASE in saddle height, if I wanted it (not 25mm), and a 5mm overall decrease in pedal stroke diameter.
The B is offline