Old 07-14-14, 07:40 PM
  #18  
NormanF
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by roccobike
The advantage of the steel fork over carbon is cost. The lower end steel is cheaper to manufacture than a carbon fork. The advantage over an alloy fork is, well, shock absorption. A steel fork, especially one with a rake, can really smooth out the ride vs alloy. Personally, I would still prefer carbon over steel. But if I was purchasing an entry level bike and had a choice of steel or alloy fork, I'd consider that an easy decision, steel all the way. I've owned and rode two all alloy bikes with alloy forks (back in my bike flipping days), one entry level, one mid-level (from the 90's). Hated both and promptly sold them.
Alloy is much better designed since then. My commuter bike feels compliant and stable both unloaded and when carrying home groceries. Its an alloy bike with a carbon fork that makes short work of rough streets. I love it!
NormanF is offline