Originally Posted by
Roody
I'm glad that it's working out this way. Personally, I would rather not see the workers fired. I would rather see the agency required to restate policies regarding car ownership as grounds for suspecting abuse.
Though it was never made clear by the OP, wasn't the investigation initiated as a result of allegations that the child was being endangered by riding a bicycle on busy highways, and not car ownership? Suspicion of a lack of any apparent planning for how to promptly handle emergencies may have been a result of facts uncovered during the initial investigation.