Old 03-28-16, 02:26 PM
  #8  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,811

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5834 Post(s)
Liked 2,671 Times in 1,487 Posts
I'm assuming here that you're talking about a rack with legs, and that the frame has fender eyes. If hat's not the case, stop reading this.

The carrier's legs are what carries the load, and the forward mount, whether st the post or stays, only provides stability. Mostly it's of the fore/aft type (try mounting a rack without attaching the front), but there's also an element of anti-sway. The anti-sway feature's importance depends on the rack, with some getting good rigidity from the legs alone, and others not so much. But keep in mind that most of the better racks also allow a single strap to the brake bolt, which provides no anti-sway benefit at all.

So, IMO, either mount will serve, except that on a taller frame, the clamp may be high compared to the rack deck, calling for a longer strap, and reducing rigidity. One minor benefit of using 2 seat stay clamps vs. the single post clamp is redundancy. If either clamp bolt loosens and falls out, the other will keep the rack attached and keep it from flipping backward. How much that matters depends on how you are about general maintenance, and in any case a safety strap could be improvised if you feel it's warranted.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is online now