View Single Post
Old 12-19-05, 06:28 AM
  #12  
mollusk
Elite Fred
 
mollusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edge City
Posts: 10,945

Bikes: 2009 Spooky (cracked frame), 2006 Curtlo, 2002 Lemond (current race bike) Zurich, 1987 Serotta Colorado, 1986 Cannondale for commuting, a 1984 Cannondale on loan to my son

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 19 Posts
I'd like to add a few things to jppe's post.

The basic premise of jppe's post is correct: fewer calories in than burned results in lower body weight. What needs to be added is that your body burns sugars/fats/muscle in different proportions that vary with the intensity of the activity. Very intense workouts burn the "premium" fuels (sugars and muscle) while less intense workout can better access fat stores. The bottom line is that if you want to lose a lot of fat you will have to put in long hours at relaxed pace; the process cannot be hurried. Search for some of Dannoxyz's posts in the Training and Nutrition forum for more details.
mollusk is offline