View Single Post
Old 01-17-06, 04:27 PM
  #23  
tlc20010
The Grampster
 
tlc20010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 657

Bikes: Eddy Merckx SXM, LeMond Buenos Aires, Cannondale Road Warrior 1000 plus a couple of comforts (Specialized Crossroads and Giant Cyprus) and a beater mtb for around town.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stapfam
I reckon that a top runner can do a marathon in 2 1/2 hrs. Good club runners in 3+ and good fitness joggers in 4. It is that 4 hour mark you have to aim for as a Fitness or 3+ as a good club runner. Distance for this is the problem but a Flat Metric century- 65 miles on the road should be about right. If much elevation is there though, then 50 miles should suffice.
No, no, no. I don't run any more and I love to cycle, but a century is nowhere near a marathon. Consider, the TdF was 22 stages in 24 days--the vast majority of them were more than 100 miles at very competitive paces. There is no runner in the world who could run a competitive marathon a day for three weeks. The marathon is much more grueling. I don't want to take anything away from doing a century or even a metric (I certainly love to brag whenever I manage those distances), but physically, they are nowhere near the feat that a marathon is. It may well be that the psychic satisfaction and the mental challenge may be similar, but physically, there is little comparison. IMHO.
tlc20010 is offline