View Single Post
Old 05-19-06, 09:00 AM
  #1  
Peek the Geek
is slower than you
 
Peek the Geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: WI
Posts: 1,486

Bikes: Gunnar Sport, Marin Pine Mountain, Gunnar Ruffian, Gunnar Roadie, BMC Fourstroke, Salsa Vaya

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fork size and handling

I thought I might be best off asking the framebuilding folks this one. I've got a hardtail mountain bike I'm building up that's spec'ed for 80mm of travel. For a rigid fork, the frame manufacturer suggests a 438mm fork, but I found a great deal on a 425mm fork.

I e-mailed both frame and fork manufacturers to ask if a 425 would be okay. Here's the response, in part, from the fork manufacturer: "The handling on the bike will be much twitchier and the BB will be lower and youll most likely clip more rocks with a shorter fork but you may actually like the more agressive position on the bike."

I know the 13mm shorter fork will change the handling, but will it be as extreme a difference as the quote above suggests? Much twitchier? Clip more rocks?

What do you all think?
__________________
Proud supporter of the Chippewa Off-Road Bike Association (CORBA)
www.chippewaoffroad.org

Peek the Geek is offline