View Single Post
Old 09-14-01, 08:44 AM
  #7  
John E
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times in 836 Posts
Precisely, Rainman. A one-tooth change in cog size, corresponding to about a 4- to 7-percent ratio change, is a near-ideal ratio progression. In 1965, with a 5-speed freewheel and limited derailleur capacity, the best solution was to adopt a 2-tooth progression, and to fill in the gaps with half-step (e.g. 47-50 / 14-16-18-20-23) or Alpine/one-and-a-half-step gearing (e.g. 42-50 / 14-16-18-20-23). [Note that by swapping only the inner chainring, one can quickly change between half-step for level rides and 1.5-step for hill work, as I do on my 2-chainring road bikes.] With a 9-cog freehub, you can now obtain a decent range across the freewheel without leaving any gaps in the critical middle and high ranges, thereby eliminating the need for carefully-interlaced gear ratio progressions.
John E is offline