Old 09-02-06, 09:28 AM
  #3  
HiYoSilver
Rides again
 
HiYoSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SW. Sacramento Region, aka, down river
Posts: 3,282

Bikes: Giant OCR T, Trek SC

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by branman1986
a few random thoughts...
I'd like the ability to drive faster if I were a "skilled" driver, but it wouldn't prevent people from driving slowly in the left lane, which probably causes as many accidents as driving too fast.
Thanks for the feedback. Actually I think slow drivers impeding traffic flow cause more accidents than driving fast. Fast driving as a cause is just a simple excuse to avoid doing accident cause analysis.

Civil lawsuits should take care of the difference in income/wealth for penalties against bad drivers. ie, rich drivers get sued for much more than poor drivers, so the financial pain should be similar

I dunno, it's too early in the morning for my brain to work properly
Civil would still be available. Fault/nofault and reimbursement to victims is not changed. Just an addition, like the added tax on cigarettes. You're involved with, then you pay without victim having to do anything.
HiYoSilver is offline